beautifuldata.net Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the beautifuldata.net

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host beautifuldata.net. Currently, hosted in Germany and its service provider is Neue Medien Muennich GmbH .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

skip to content beautiful data blogging about big data, visualization and new market research risk vs. loss a risk is defined as the probability of an undesirable event to take place. since most risks are not totally random but rather dependent of a range of influences, we try to quantify a risk function, that gives the probability for each set of influences. we then calculate the expected loss by multiplying the costs that are caused by the occurrence of this event with the risk, i.e. its probability. often, the influences can be changed by our actions. we might have a choice. so it makes sense to look for a course of actions that would minimize the loss function, i.e. lead to as little expected damages as possible. algorithms that run in many procedures and on many devices often make decisions. prominent examples are credit scoring or shop recommendation systems. in both cases it is clear that the algorithm should be designed to optimize the economic outcome of its decision. in both cases, two risks emerge: the risk of a false negative (i.e. wrongly give credit to someone who cannot pay it back, resp. make a recommendation that does not fit the customer’s preferences), and the risk of a false positive (not granting credit to a person that would have been creditworthy, resp. not offering something that would have been exactly what the customer was looking for). there is however an asymmetry in the losses of these two risks. for the vast majority of cases, it is far more easy to calculate the loss for a false negative than for the false positive. the cost of credit default is straightforward. the cost of someone not getting the money is however most certainly bigger than just the missed interests; the potential borrower might very well go away and never come back, without us ever realizing. even worse, while calculating risk is (more or less) just maths and statistics, different people might not even agree on the losses. in our credit scoring example: one might say, let’s just take what we know for sure, i.e. the opportunity costs of missed interests, the other might insist to evaluate a broader range of damages. the line where to stop is obviously arbitrary. so while the risk function can be made somehow objective, the loss function will be much more tricky and most of the time prone to doubt and discussion. collision decision in the iot – the world of connected devices, of programmable object, the problem of risks and losses becomes vital. self-driving cars will cause accidents, too, even if they are much safer than human drivers. if a collision is inevitable, how should the car react? this was the key question ask by majken sander in our talk on algorithm ethics at strata+hadoop world. if it is just me in the car, a possible manoeuvre would turn the car sideways. if however my children sit next to me, i might very well prefer a frontal crash and rather have me injured than my passengers. whatever i would see as the right way to act, it is clear that i want to make the decision myself. i would not want to have it decided remotely without my even knowing on what grounds. sometimes people mention that even for human casualties, a monetary calculation could be done -no matter how cruel that might sound. we could e.g. take the valuation of humans according to their life expectancy, insurance costs, or any other financial indicator. however, this is clearly not, how we would usually deal with lethal risks. “no man left behind” -how could we explain saving-private-ryan-ish campaigns on economic grounds? since the human casualty in the values of our society is regarded as total , not commensurable (even if a compensation can be defined), we get a singularity in our loss function. our metric just doesn’t work here. hence there will be no just algorithm to deal with a decision of that dimension. calculate risks, let losses be open we will nevertheless have to find a solution. one suggestion for the car example is, that in risky situations, the car would re-delegate the driving back to a human to let them decide. this can be generalized: since the losses might be valuated differently by different people, it should always be well documented and fully transparent to the users, how the losses are calculated. in many cases, the loss function could be kept open. the algorithm could offer different sets of parameters to let the users decide on the behavior of product. as a society we have to demand to be in charge defining the ethics behind the algorithms. it is a strong cause for regulation, i am convinced about that. it is not an economic, but a political task. further reading algorithm ethics author joerg blumtritt posted on 16. may 2015 20. september 2016 categories algorithm , politics leave a comment on risk vs. loss what to expect from strata conference 2015? an empirical outlook. in one week, the 2015 edition of strata conference (or rather: strata + hadoop world) will open its doors to data scientists and big data practitioners from all over the world. what will be the most important big data technology trends for this year? as last year, i ran an analysis on the strata abstract for 2015 and compared them to the previous years. one thing immediately strikes: 2015 will be probably known as the “spark strata”: if you compare mentions of the major programming languages in data science, there’s another interesting find: r seems to have a comeback and python may be losing some of its momentum: r is also among the rising topics if you look at the word frequencies for 2015 and 2014: now, let’s take a look at bigrams that have been gaining a lot of traction since the last strata conference. from the following table, we could expect a lot more case studies than in the previous years: this analysis has been done with ipython and pandas. see the approach in this notebook . looking forward to meeting you all at strata conference next week! i’ll be around all three days and always in for a chat on data science. author benedikt koehler posted on 9. february 2015 20. september 2016 categories big data , conference , data science , python , r , textmining tags python , r , spark , strata conference , text mining 1 comment on what to expect from strata conference 2015? an empirical outlook. slow data abstract: data is the new media. thus the postulates of our slow media manifesto should be applicable on big data, too. slow data in this sense is meaningful data, relevant for society, driving creativity and scientific thinking. slow data is beautiful data. from slow media to slow data five years ago, we wrote the slow media manifesto. we were concerned about the strange dichotomy by which people separated old media from new media to make their point about quality, ethics, and aesthetics. with big data , i now encounter a similar mindset. just like people were scoffing social media to be just doodles, scribbling, or worse, i now see people scornfully raising their eyebrows about the lack of structure, missing consistency, and other alleged flaws they imagine big data to carry. as if “good old data” with a small sample size, representativeness, and other formalistic criteria would be a better thing, as such. again what these people see, is just an evil new vice swamped over their mature businesses by unseasoned startups, however insanely well funded. i have gone through this argument twice already. it was wrong in the 90s when the web started, it was wrong again in the 2000s regarding social media, and it will not become right this time. because it is not the technology paradigm that makes quality. a mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns. if his patterns are more permanent than theirs, it is because they are made with ideas. beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics. godfrey harold hardy data is the new media . i have written about this too. the traditional concept of media becomes more and more directl

URL analysis for beautifuldata.net

http://beautifuldata.net/category/sensors/
http://beautifuldata.net/2013/10/
http://beautifuldata.net/tag/fitness-tracker/
http://beautifuldata.net/author/furukama/
http://beautifuldata.net/2012/04/
http://beautifuldata.net/2015/01/2014-highlight-on-of-the-best-courses-on-big-data-and-data-mining/#respond
http://beautifuldata.net/2014/01/trending-topics-at-strata-conferences-2011-2014/
http://beautifuldata.net/tag/sensor-data/
http://beautifuldata.net/2015/02/slow-data/#respond
http://beautifuldata.net/2015/05/risk-vs-loss/#respond
http://beautifuldata.net/2012/11/wikipedia-attention-and-the-us-elections/
http://beautifuldata.net/tag/epistemology/
http://beautifuldata.net/tag/explorative-data-analysis/
http://beautifuldata.net/2014/05/how-to-create-a-location-graph-from-the-foursquare-api/
http://beautifuldata.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/btc_network.png
mediacom.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: BEAUTIFULDATA.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1697109748_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.registrygate.com
Registrar URL: http://www.registrygate.com
Updated Date: 2018-01-16T08:27:56Z
Creation Date: 2012-01-15T13:56:21Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-01-15T13:56:21Z
Registrar: RegistryGate GmbH
Registrar IANA ID: 1328
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS5.KASSERVER.COM
Name Server: NS6.KASSERVER.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-03-12T21:48:57Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR RegistryGate GmbH

SERVERS

  SERVER net.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =beautifuldata.net

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME beautifuldata.net

  CHANGED 2018-01-16

  CREATED 2012-01-15

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS5.KASSERVER.COM 85.13.128.3

  NS6.KASSERVER.COM 85.13.159.101

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .